Editorial policy
Local Public Dispatch aims to make public information easier to read without overstating what a document proves. We distinguish explanation from reporting, state uncertainty plainly and correct errors when they are identified.
Accuracy and context
We check claims against the material available to us and make clear what kind of document or statement is being discussed. We avoid implying that an agenda is a decision, that a summary is a complete record or that an example represents every local process. When context is limited, we say so.
Independence
Editorial decisions are made for reader value and clarity. A partnership does not buy editorial approval, and contributors or partners do not receive control over independent coverage.
Corrections
Readers can use the Contact page to identify a possible error and point to the relevant passage. We review correction requests, amend confirmed errors and make the nature of a material correction clear to readers.
Partner material and illustrations
Paid, commissioned or otherwise partner-supported material is labelled clearly where it appears. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; when used, they are identified as illustrations and are not presented as documentary evidence.
Clarity starts with the document
We look closely at how public information is put together, so readers can follow what it says without mistaking a notice for a decision or a summary for the full record.